Prediction of Margaret Hellyer vs Fay Muller Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hellyer vs F. Muller

Margaret Hellyer

AUS

3

Win

Played

5

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Fay Muller

AUS

3

Win

Played

5

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hellyer 3 - 5 Muller

They have played 18 sets in total, with Margaret Hellyer winning 7 and Fay Muller winning 11. The last match between Fay Muller and Margaret Hellyer was at the Brisbane, 28-10-1960, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Fay Muller getting the victory 6-2 8-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hellyer	3
Muller	5

Last 8 H2H Matches:

() Brisbane(10-28-60)

Stats

Fay Muller

Margaret Hellyer

() Brisbane(10-29-59)

Stats

Fay Muller

Margaret Hellyer

(R4) Sydney(11-06-57)

Stats

Margaret Hellyer

Fay Muller

M. Hellyer vs F. Muller H2H Profile

M. Hellyer	Stats	F. Muller
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.31% (165-128)	Career Total W/L	58.02% (123-89)
3	Grass	5
3	Total H2H Matches	5
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Hellyer vs F. Muller Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Margaret Hellyer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Fay Muller has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Margaret Hellyer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fay Muller has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Margaret Hellyer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fay Muller has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Margaret Hellyer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Fay Muller winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Margaret Hellyer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 7/2), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 15/13). Fay Muller has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 78% (W/L 12/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 26/26).
Player level: In the last year, Margaret Hellyer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Fay Muller has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 8 times before with Margaret Hellyer winning 3 times and Fay Muller being victorious 5 times. They have played 18 sets in total, with Margaret Hellyer winning 7 and Fay Muller winning 11.
The last match between Margaret Hellyer and Fay Muller was at the Brisbane, 28-10-1960, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Fay Muller getting the victory 6-2 8-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Margaret Hellyer and Fay Muller have played a deciding set 2 times, with Margaret Hellyer winning 1 times and Fay Muller 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Margaret Hellyer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Fay Muller has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Margaret Hellyer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fay Muller has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Margaret Hellyer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fay Muller has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Margaret Hellyer vs Fay Muller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Hellyer vs F. Muller H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Hellyer	Stats	F. Muller
3	H2H Matches Won	5
7	Sets Won	11
79	Games Won	90
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
38% (3/8)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	63% (5/8)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (5/6)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (1/6)
17% (1/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Hellyer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Le Zoute - 15-08-1962
F Rita BentleyR. Bentley	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
SF Renata OstermannR. Ostermann	W	6-0 4-6 6-3	Stats
M RucquoisM. Rucquois	W	0-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Geneva - 02-08-1962
F Paule CourteixP. Courteix	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Montana - 09-07-1962
SF M T BolzanoM. T	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

F. Muller Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Championships - 10-01-1963
R3 Joan GibsonJ. Gibson	L	8-6 6-2	Stats
Melbourne - 06-12-1962
R3 Trish McclenaughanT. Mcclenaughan	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
R2 Pat TurnerP. Turner	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R4 Robyn EbbernR. Ebbern	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Sydney - 22-11-1962
R4 Jan LehaneJ. Lehane	L	6-4 6-0	Stats

View All

M. Hellyer vs F. Muller Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Hellyer	Stats	F. Muller
56.31% (165/128)	YTD Win/Loss	58.02% (123/89)
55.09% (357/291)	Sets Win/Loss	58.30% (274/196)
100.00% (3087/0)	Games Win/Loss	54.21% (2322/1961)
77.78% (7/2)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
56.30% (76/59)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (26/26)
50.00% (1/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
55.46% (66/53)	Grass Win/Loss	60.43% (84/55)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
45.16% (14/17)	Slam W/L	53.66% (22/19)
56% (159/283)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (120/208)
52% (41/79)	Deciding Set Win %	37% (20/54)
88% (157/138)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (128/107)
12% (157/19)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (128/21)
17% (129/22)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (80/13)